Hume’s Argument Against Miracles: A Short Answer
Blog Post
Hume’s Argument Against Miracles: A Short Answer

What did David Hume believe? In general, Hume was a skeptic who demanded scientific evidence for any truth claim (see Empiricism or Scientism).[1]If it could not be confirmed through observation, experience, or by the senses, Hume argued that we had reason in the least to doubt it if not to reject it altogether. This foundational idea guided Hume to make several major controversial claims concerning reality.[2]Among Hume’s many claims was his objection to miracles and miracle accounts. Hume believed that miracles, as violations of the laws of nature, were impossible and reports of them should not be believed.[3]

Though this claim seems sensible to many, there is actually a very good reason to reject it.[4]If we look at Hume’s definition of a miracle, on which his whole argument is based, we will see that it is incorrect and, consequently, that his argument doesn’t work. Hume defined a miracle as “a violation of the laws of nature” and then argued that since the laws of nature cannot be violated, miracles must be rejected.[5]In response to this, J. L. Mackie said:

The laws of nature … describe the ways in which the world—including, of course, human beings—works when left to itself, when not interfered with. A miracle occurs when the world is not left to itself, when something distinct from the natural order as a whole intrudes into it.[6]

In other words, Hume built his argument for rejecting miracles on a flawed and question-begging definition. Miracles are not violations of the laws of nature because miracles are not subject to the laws of nature. Starting from a false premise (miracles are violations of the laws of nature) Hume’s argument fails to confirm its conclusion (miracles are impossible).



[3]Hume wrote, “a miracle is a violation of the laws of nature” [Enquiries, p. 114].

[4]Hume’s claim here, if it is true, has very serious consequences for Christian faith. If miracles are indeed impossible, then the Bible is not true, Jesus Christ is not raised, and Christians are fools (cf. 1 Cor. 15:14-17).


[6]Mackie, J. L., 1982, The Miracle of Theism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[7]Whether there can be exceptions to the laws of nature is a separate question having to do with the causal closedness of the universe.

Nathan Liddell was born and raised in the South—Alabama, Florida, and Tennessee—but now calls Aurora, Colorado home.
Connect with Nathan
While You're Here
If you found this blog beneficial, consider donating to The Daily Apologist.
Donate Today
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Sign up to receive a monthly newsletter about the work of The Daily Apologist!

No spam, just helpful articles and insights. Unsubscribe anytime you’d like.

Providing Christians with intellectual and personal preparation needed to grow, proclaim, and defend the Christian worldview.

Newsletter Subscription
5016 Spedale Ct. #425
Spring Hill TN 37174
Phone Number
Working Hours
Mon – Fri: 9:00am – 5:00pm

2020 © All rights reserved. Please review our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy